MAC 4 – Week 4 –
Response to Daniel Brown
Daniel,
I too became emotional at the failing school project in
London. I think the thing that attracted
me to the story instantly was the term, “Failing”. They were already labeled and I had already
made certain assumptions about the students or “them”. The fact that the students overcame those
assumptions and became engaged with the Orchestra is the plotline that fills the
reader with emotion. In a way it is much
more meaningful to realize that response in us.
It is true that we were moved by there response? I would prefer to think of myself as not
being moved. I would like to change my
perspective to the story that it is not moving because it is expected. I will work on that.
I also find Zander’s student letters inspiring. I believe every teacher has a box or drawer
somewhere with these mementos of hope. I
found the NASA student letter and the idea of discovery equally interesting,
especially under the light of a previous chapter on measurement. So often our “framework” involves terms of
measurement and discovery in and of itself is not as highly valued. In public schools it seems as if we must
constantly balance on the thin line between Measurement/Assessment and
Discovery/Learning? Perhaps one day I
will fall…
Original Post: Week 4 - The Art
of Possibility, Chapters 9-12 - Daniel Brown
While I enjoyed some of the stories, and even felt a bit
emotional when I learned about Zander's project with the failing schools in
London, I think the vast majority of this material is "brain fluff"
and is written to help people other than myself find a way to look at the world
like I already do. There were only two paragraphs from this last reading that
truly had a positive impact on me. The first started on page 174 and the second
was on page 175.
The first paragraph is the lead to the section called
Environments for Possibility and invokes an image of the sort of person I want
to be. It creates for me a vision, within the framework that Zander sets out
for what a vision should be, of the kind of person I feel like when I'm at my
best. I've been in that situation before, when I'm feeling vibrant and
passionate and people are following along. Sometimes I catch myself in them and
realize that this is what being a leader means, but I never get there by trying
to be a leader. That part just happens.
I most often find myself in these situations when I'm
involved in my coaching. Fencing can be a very passionate sport. Unlike racing
or team sports, it's one person pitted against another. In other sports, like
olympic rowing, it's really you against yourself. The other boats are there,
but they're not stopping you from getting to the finish line. In team sports,
like basketball, the other team opposes you, but your victory or defeat is
shared with the team. Not so in fencing, where the glory or defeat is yours
alone, and to win you've got to be better, fight harder and want it more than
the other guy.
As for the second paragraph, it was actually a letter from
one of Zander's students, one she wrote to NASA, that inspired me. As a Science
teacher I have a deep appreciation for discovery for it's own sake. I also
understand that the value of a discovery that hasn't been made can be hard to
measure, so I give a great deal of credit to those who dedicate themselves to
finding something, not knowing what that something is. It doesn't have to be
NASA. I think we can all be explorers in our own way, within our own little,
wonderful universes.
Link to Original
Post: http://poweracademic.blogspot.com/
Photo Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/benrmatthews/3453232283/